Saturday, 23 May 2015

Far From the Madding Crowd: Review

Far From the Madding Crowd is almost a perfect example of the Period genre's pornographic sensibilities. It's an idyllic recreation of rural Wessex in the 1800s. The springs are all lush, sun-soaked fields, the winters all virginal white hills. Carey Mulligan is positively radiant as the worlds cleanest farm owner. And as usual the costume and set design are done to near perfection. All of which serves to make the whole endeavour feel just a little bit unreal,undercutting much of the drama and character relationship.

At the time the hiring of The Hunt director Thomas Vinterberg, co-founder of Dogme '95, must have seemed like a radical choice for an adaptation of a Thomas Hardy novel. Which makes it sad then that the result is so conventional. A well-acted, beautifully shot work that look just too nice to feel authentic and a stark contrast to the 1967 version.

The good news is that the nuts and bolts of Hardy's classic novel are still intact. In Mulligan's hands Bathsheba Everdene is a much more tempered creature. Still independent and defiant but more out of uncertainty than the belief that she don't need no  man. It even comes across subtly in scenes in which her strength is called upon. When she takes control of Everdene farm her doubt can be heard in Mulligan's voice and yet when she declares her intention 'to astound you all.' she really means it.

As inciting incidents go it really says something when a film can convey utter horror and tragedy at the death of a flock of sheep as befalls Bathsheba's first suitor Gabriel Oak (Matthias Schoenaerts). With smouldering eyes Oak is a decent man but also one coloured by the conventions of the time, thinking he can woo Bathsheba with the promise of comfort and a good income. When he receives his humbling at the death of his livelihood Schoenaerts really sells his sad frustration becomes a picture of nobility in poverty.

Suitor number two comes in the form of wealthy widower William Boldwood (Michael Sheen). This is a role that would seem every bit as arrogant as Oak in the hands of a lesser actor but Sheen vrings real vulnerability to the role. Of all Bathsheba's suitors his is the most sympathetic with an earnestness to his desire to protect her.

Suitor number three is Tom Sturridge's powerhouse of testosterone Sargent Troy. A soldier who manages to woo Bathsheba into a foolish marriage of passion with his fancy swordsmanship (no, not a euphemism). He is perhaps the weakest of the three but speaks to the folly that exists within Bathsheba despite all her resolve.

The conflict between these three men is mostly understated but builds to an intense climax. Mulligan all the while seems to constantly be ruminating on the nature of love and marriage. Having succumbed to her heart with Troy and wishing to follow her head with Boldwood. All the while building a fond friendship with Oak. By the end you see the relationship which has the most value because it has been built over the years not won with money or showmanship.

This for me is what separates Bathsheba from the likes of Lizzy Bennett and Jane Eyre who seem to be simply waiting for circumstances to permit them to marry. Bathsheba on the other hand genuinely develops a strong friendship with her eventual partner. She's not waiting for equality of position (indeed she is of higher status than him for most of the film) but instead equality of affection.

It's a shame then that such timeless storytelling have to live with such a clean, flat production. Everything's been lovingly crafted to perfection but in such a way that leaves the film feeling passionless. Britain still loves it's Period Porn, if we can call it that, but the genre is so overdone that it's in desperate need of a shake-up. This unfortunately isn't it.






Monday, 4 May 2015

Unpleasant new chapter in the Chronicle of Josh Trank

Folks it's time to talk about Josh Trank.

I've been resisting the urge to sound off about Trank for a while, especially with regards to his role directing the new Fantastic Four film. But news is new's and last nights reveal that the Chronicle director had stepped down from one of the upcoming Star Wars anthology films certainly adds credence to rumours circulating about Fantastic Four.



So in case you missed it Trank, who first hit the scene with found footage superhero film Chronicle, was in the midst of developing a spin-off to the new Star Wars Trilogy. The 'Anthology' films are set to begin next year with 'Rogue One' directed by Garreth Edwards. However after failing to appear at the Anthology panel at this years Star Wars Celebration (citing illness) Trank released the following statement:

"After a year of having the incredible honour of developing with the wonderful and talented people at Lucasfilm, I’m making a personal decision to move forward on a different path. I’ve put a tremendous amount of thought into this, and I know deep down in my heart that I want to pursue some original creative opportunities."

So yeah, Trank is out, having ostensibly walked from what must have been a dream project. This feels like a climax to something bad that's been brewing for a while, mostly on the set of Fantastic Four. Trank was hired to direct Fox's latest attempt at an FF film shortly after the release of Chronicle.

Chronicle Film Poster.jpg
Trank's debut feature released to critical acclaim.


For a while it seemed like the best possible move Fox could have made. Everyone was riding high on the acclaim Chronicle had received and the film geek bubble were desperate to see what Trank did next. Then the story and casting details started to emerge; fans were confused and irate at the cast's average age skewing younger. With particular regards to the still relatively young Miles Teller cast as the mature, level-headed group leader Reed Richards (and also sadly about Michael B. Jordan cast as the traditionally white Johnny Storm). The explanation that this was to bring the film more in line with Marvel's Ultimate imprint from which it is looking to adapt. However the fact that Ultimate Marvel is not particularly well-liked among comic book fans meant this did nothing to stem the criticism.

Then the actual rumours started around the films production.Trank has been said to be "indecisive and uncommunicative" according to unconfirmed sources in The Hollywood Reporter. Much of the dialogue seems to suggest Trank was unaccustomed to working with a big-scale blockbuster production. Seasoned writer and producer Simon Kinberg was brought on the overhaul the script and tensions between Kinberg and Trank are suspected. The only thing known for certain is that the final film did require substantial re-shoots, exacerbated by the cast's conflicting schedules.

Now I generally don't want to give too much credit to rumour and speculation. Trank is clearly a talented director, Chronicle is proof enough of that. Was Fantastic Four just too big of a production to step into right after? Maybe. I will admit the trailers are giving hints of structural problems but that's nothing to go on. Right now the situation seems to be 50/50: Fantastic Four will either be yet another disappointing comic book movie or it could be something legitimately weird and unique as is being teased.

The main take-back is that it must really suck to be Josh Trank at the moment. Film geeks and comic book fans alike are lining up to crap on his film before it's even been released. The production clearly hasn't been plain sailing and to cap it all off he's having to walk from every sci-fi fans dream, whatever the reason. If Fantastic Four tanks as badly as some fanboys are hoping it will a talented man's career might be over before it's even really begun.